The minor clock speed difference means the 10850k should offer just 3 percent less performance than the 10900k at a lower price point. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance. The 10900 isn't overclockable and is only $14 less, with the only advantage being a 100 mhz higher base frequency.
In Games The 5800X And 10900K Are Pretty Much Equal Depending On Which Games/Reviews You Use Also.
Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. Any modern cpu clocks down way below 2.8ghz when idle. Don't worry about idle power draw.
If More Cores Are Loaded They Won't Go That High.
The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. The 10900 because it sounds better. As a result, the 10850k is the better buy for most of us.
While That Might Be A Slight Bump In The New Flagship’s Way, The 10850K Also Managed To Take A Lead In A Few Tests.
The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5.3. Multithreading technology (such as intel's hyperthreading or amd's simultaneous multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor's physical cores. Yes that's the only reason i could think of as well.
Tl:dr, It's A Great Gaming Chip That Doesn't Lose Fps Vs 10900K (Or 10850K), But Suffers Mildly In Synthetic And Production Workloads.
Core i9 10850k vs core i9 10900k test in 10 games. If i were building, i'd go 10850k since it's cheaper and should be close enough to a 10900k. These features, together with an ipc (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a cpu performs.